Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Obama and Ginsburg: Founding Fathers? Hacks!

'The Forgotten Man' by Jon McNaughton . Buy the print HERE!

Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg

Editor's note:  This post is a little longer than most, but trust me, the payoff at the end is worth it! :)

I admit it.  I have a colossal man-crush on the U.S. Constitution.  To think that our Founders crafted a document that has withstood liberal progressive onslaught for over 220 years is simply awe-inspiring.  To this American, the Constitution is our nation's most precious commodity, our greatest contribution to humanity.  It is a shining beacon of freedom, giving hope to the oppressed all across the globe that like the Founders, they too have a chance to shed the manacles of tyranny.

Unfortunately, not every American feels this way.  Even more unfortunately, two of those are President Barack Hussein Obama and Supreme Court Justice Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg.

I do have to give Dear Leader points for openly admitting his contempt and scorn for the Constitution during his recent interview with NBC's Matt Lauer.  Keep in mind, these words were spoken by a man who swore an oath to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. Sayeth Obama....

What's frustrated people is that I have not been able to FORCE (emphasis mine) Congress to implement every aspect of what I said in 2008.  Well, you know, it turns out our Founders designed a system that makes it more difficult to bring about change than I would like sometimes.

There is is folks, everything you need to know about Barack Hussein Obama, distilled down into 48 of his own despicable words.  Freedom loving Americans should be very thankful that the Founders designed the system that they did.  More than 200 years ago, they could foresee a tyrant want-to-be gaining the highest office in the land, and they knew what to do about that possibility.  Just more evidence of the true agenda of Barack Hussein Obama, and of the brilliant foresight of the men in that Philadelphia room during the summer of 1787.

At least we can be comforted that the Supreme Court of the United States stands ready to "support and defend" our Constitution, as their oath of office requires.  Yeah, maybe not so much.  Justice Buzzi Ginsburg was interviewed on Egyptian TV recently.  The reporter asked her where Egypt's leaders should turn for guidance in crafting the structure and foundation of a new Egyptian government.  You might think this was a slam-dunk question for a SCOTUS justice, you would be wrong.  Sayeth Buzzi Ginsburg....

I would not look to the U.S. Constitution if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012.  I might look at the constitution of South Africa.  That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, had an independent judiciary, it really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done.

Now, doesn't that give you a warm, fuzzy feeling that Justice Ginsburg is using the U.S. Constitution as her guiding force when ruling from the bench of the highest court in the land?  Me neither.  Being the dutiful blogger I am, I read the constitution of South Africa, and encourage you to do the same here.  It's a hoot!  Be forewarned, the document is a lengthy and verbose thesis on the theory and application of liberal statism.  I particularly liked its Bill of Rights, which outlines the cradle to grave governmental dependency that liberal whackjobs like Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg can really revel in.  It also every now and then sounds like it was written by an 9 year old girl.  For example, I give you section 9, subsections 3 through 5.....

(3)  The state may not unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds, including race, gender, sex, pregnancy, marital status, ethnic or social origin, colour, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, language and birth.

(4) No person may unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds in terms of subsection (3).  National legislation must be enacted to prevent or prohibit unfair discrimination.

And now the punchline.....

(5) Discrimination on one or more of the grounds listed in subsection (3) is unfair unless it is established that the discrimination is fair.

That's just one example of the lunacy that Justice Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg sees as "a great piece of work" that is superior and more desirable than the United States Constitution.  As for Justice Ginsburg herself, she hasn't done a great piece of work since this.......

Please join us on Facebook, and click the badge at the right to voice your opinion of SACSTW!


  1. Crew, RIGHT ON, this is a great post. Sums it up and I like the "crush" part, the Constitution is everything, once they trivialize it and shred its importance its over.

  2. Thanks Laurel. A little less Ewwww factor than Morgan Freeman. :)

  3. Laurel- Thanks for the kind words. At least the secular progressives like Barry and Ruthie are finally coming out into the open with their contempt for the Constitution. Can you imagine the damage another 4 years of Dear Leader would inflict on our country?